Behind the counterfeiting ♠≥of enterprises, there are local environ÷σmental protection departments “ <♥↕≠open one eye closed ε one eye ” inaction or even ↓↕active fraud to show pollution control σ achievements. What has been de↓ε↔ stroyed is not only a few mon★±β★itoring technicians, seve ₩≈ral environmental monitorin↔πg stations, but also the foundation o₽↓≤→f the national environmental mo♠'βnitoring data, which has destroyed↑∞•¶ the credibility of ≈☆∑←the environmental protection ♣®© department.

Environmental monitoring data i¶₽s the decision basis of environme ®ntal governance. If the✘¶♣ source flooding is false, •≈♠↑the decision is bound to££ be deviant, and it is ‌§♣εharmful to the environmental go≠¥δvernance opportunity to damage∑¥♣₹ the public interest.

Since January 1, 201 →δ→6, the Ministry of envir↕÷•onmental protection has impleΩ mented the methods of judging and≥₹<‍ handling environmental mo"₩σnitoring data falsificat$→§♥ion. According to the pro‍≈visions of the "m™↕★easures", the Ministry o©€f environmental prot✘$&ection will use a special inspe∏¥↔αction for two years in th ♠e future to strictly check t¶'$he local environmental mβ∑onitoring data, especially the fa±₽↕lse behavior of air qu ≤β£ality testing data. It is wor≥‌thwhile to praise th₹★e more rigid clubs, the counterf ♠€eiting enterprises, the≤$ local environmental§σ→$ protection departments and the ¶₩★local governments.

From the overall point of view, the cγ×Ωentral and local investment iΩ✔n the field of envirσ$©♦onmental monitoring is huge,© ₽ and the online monitoring netwo γ∏rk has already used more than t&★φ✔en billion funds. In theory, it has th↔δ™e ability to monitor tens of t≠β housands of pollution sources. Am♦ε$ong them, only one air monitor$ Ωing system invested 4≈→36 million yuan. In 2014, t&✔he largest air quality mo"♣>nitoring network in dev¥↑eloping countries was built☆®→≤. It is against this bac< ♣​kground that some loαα♥cal governments have to fabricate an♦>£✘d tamper with monitoring data  ®§in order to reduce the pressure oφα♥f assessment. The central leadership ±‍has repeatedly issued instructions↑‌↓ to crack down on environme>←ntal data fraud and stri£​ct accountability for$£ false figures.

Environmental monitoring data have rise₽≈±₽n to the legal level ↑₩and have a higher binding•  force. The new environme ₹™ntal law clearly stipulates that ♦✘÷the monitoring instiΩε±€tutions should use the monitor→‍¶ing equipment that conforms t &  o the national standards, a←λ$'bide by the monitorinφσg standards, be responsible for the au↔ thenticity and accuracy of the monitori♠÷ng data, and punish the tampe‍σ‌ring, forgery or forgery and forgery ↔✘<πof the monitoring data, and in£✘÷♦vestigate legal responsib↕βilities. In the second half of 2015, ↔←≈∞the environmental protec©¶¥☆tion departments at all levels foun↕♠∏d 8 typical illegal cases, a☆↑ >ll of which had been transφ∏ferred to public security  γorgans, and 10 responsible persons wδ→ere detained in criminal or adminis λ€trative detention.

The fact that enterprises are beinΩ×→ g fraudulent shows that there are lo≤₽opholes in the online environmental δ©↔monitoring network. I understand th$↔♥at some enterprises have purchased cou✘±≥↔nterfeit equipment, ♠€£↓leaving room for data forge★₩ry and tampering, tryin↔→δ©g to muddle through. Some environm★ ≈↓ental monitoring data released by some​★®£ local governments do not accord w★₽☆♣ith the intuitive feeli​•"•ng of the citizens. Som•‍∑etimes there is even a big con> πtrast, which is also≤‍ related to this loopho♥♠'le.

Over the years, some local env∞♠ironmental testing data fraud☆α±φ has been an open secret. Just like γγ"some of the sewage t↓₽δhat has occurred in the d§☆esert in recent years, or the sewage d★↓πσischarged into the river, it is all kn®→owingly illegal. In my opinion, ★ there are local environmental prote∏♠←₹ction departments &ldquo behind the£λ se enterprises' co$≤$•unterfeiting behavior; open o→&↔Ωne eye closed one eye &rd→★≈₽quo; inaction, and eveΩ™n do not exclude the acti→¶€÷ve cooperation of counterfeiting in₩÷®± order to show the achievement of→σλ± pollution control. Thi‌ ™s practice has destroyed not only the >♦monitoring technicians and se® ↕veral environmental monitor→×★¶ing stations, but also the foundation'↔ of the national environmental mδφonitoring data, which un‍↕↑↕dermined the credibility of the enviroφ>γnmental protection department. ‍÷‌≠