With the impleπ≥≥÷mentation of a series λ♣σφof national key projects, the i± Ω‍nstrumentation industry hα≈™as gained increasing attention and sup∑₩₽±port from the government. This w♥±<©ill make the market value ∑'♣of instrumentation industry in≠≠₽creasingly prominent. But for ☆™εthe past year, there have been a l"←♠≤ot of great events in the instrume≥♥"γnt and instrument circle. T™Ωhe CCTV hosts study PM2.5 atδ§→ their own expense, but t$<he data have been questione↑≠d; “ water ten ” ≠‍the overseas acquisition of domes>☆φ'tic instruments; the dark matte↔<®r detection satellite developed by Ch♣€£∑inese scientists; the ¶♦laboratory safety is v∏γ∏ery important, fire. Disaster m"₽©onitoring instrument is essential; inst÷β‍rument and related me∑÷•∞etings frequently convened and so on. N©±ext I will bring you toge↕‍★ther to summarize.

CCTV host Jing Chai released "dome‌≤ below" data was questi•​≠oned, the reliability ♠§ of relevant testing equip >ment and data is imminent∞∑♥

In March of this year, Jing  ≠Chai, the host from CCTV, •σreleased a deep public interest surδ♦​vey "Jing Chai hazφ→e investigation: under the dome&quo♥™t;. This piece of pu$♣®♣blicity, Jing Chai used♦​ε a lot of data and data to sφ€ upport her conclusion, knowing that a f♠‌ γriend's doctoral thesis was ju§>st a little related to ↔ emission. He looked at it a little w∏Ωrong, looked up the data, an✔≥ d found that almost every d•πata had problems. The fi∑☆$✘rst is to intentionally confuse ✘₹↔fog and haze and PM2. 5, the next is ♣§the lack of testing range and sensitσ™ivity data, air humidity and₹≥ wind direction conditions, the flow₽σ₹ data of the sampling instru∑‍"♠ment, and the background and t∑™ime of changing data to form mislead←<ing impressions and ★♣§≥tamper information. This report co™∞✘γmes out, let netizens cry: pr×δ×★ofessional matters or   professional people to do it!

Next is the series of probl€×♣ ems such as the data counterfeiting of♦Ω air purifier developed b↕★≤y Xiaomi, the inaccuracy ↓βof various environmental testi₩$ng instruments, and the fraudγσ↕ of monitoring data. In the second hal£φf of 2015, the environmental protec≤™tion departments at all levels foundε≠ 8 typical illegal case★✔ s, all of which had been tranφ☆↑εsferred to public security orga↔π&ns, and 10 responsible personsπ ₽​ were detained in cri≠÷∏↓minal or administrative det× ✘ention. Since January 1,÷≈± 2016, the Ministry of en♥♥vironmental protection has implemen€πted the methods of judging  ≤and handling environmental monit‌∞'☆oring data falsification. Acc₩γording to the provisions of the "×≥measures", the Min↕ $istry of environmental pro'→↑tection will use a specia≈σ∞l inspection for two years in the÷₽ future to strictly check the local e≤✘€•nvironmental monitoring data≠>, especially the false behavioφ≥r of air quality testingδ® data. It is worthwhil★&≥€e to praise the more rigid clubs,↑₽ the counterfeiting enterprises,β↑± the local environmental protectioδ↔↕n departments and the local✘€ governments.